Text and images transcript of the video Celebrating the Near Ice Age - 2 by Rolf Witzsche 

Celebrating the Near Ice Age - 2

Click on the images for a larger view

Hard evidence in mass-density comparison.

Fortunately, it is not hard to determine that the Sun is not an internally powered atomic gas sphere, because this dream is not possible in the physical universe. 

The Sun is too light for it to be an atomic gas star. The mass density of the Sun is a thousand times too low in comparison with known atomic gas spheres, like Jupiter and Saturn. 

Jupiter, which has double the volume of Saturn, has correspondingly double the mass-density, as its greater gravity causes greater compression of its gas. The Sun, however, in this same comparison, with a thousand times greater volume than Jupiter, has nevertheless nearly the same mass density that Jupiter has. This would not be physically possible if the Sun was an atomic gas sphere. Its mass density would be a thousand times greater than it is.  

Of course, an atomic gas sphere of the size of the Sun, provided that a gas sphere of this size can actually exist, which it cannot, would have its atoms crushed by the enormous force of the resulting gravity. This means that the Sun is simply not a sphere of atomic gas. What is not possible, doesn't happen. And with the Sun not being a gas sphere, the fabled fusion of hydrogen into helium in the core of the Sun, by which it is deemed to be powered, is simply not happening. If the Sun isn't a gas sphere, there's nothing there to fuse. These are hard facts.

This means that according to its weight, the Sun can only be a sphere of plasma. Plasma strongly resists gravitational compression, by means of its built-in electric repulsion. The repelling force is roughly 40 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity. A plasma sphere with the mass-density that the Sun is known to have, is easily possible. The required ratio of electrons to protons in the plasma is very much possible, even natural.

The rather dramatic mass-density comparison presented here, closes the door on the internally powered Sun theory. The comparison takes away the foundation the theory is built on. It opens the horizon to the externally powered plasma sun, which, by becoming inactive, opens the door to the gigantic ice age phenomena that are known to have occurred. This in turn imposes the imperative on us, that the Ice Age infrastructures be built. It's as simple as that.

Hard evidence in solar-wind measurements.

The evidence is located in the measurements made in space by NASA's Ulysses satellite.

The Ulysses spacecraft was launched into a polar orbit around the Sun from the Shuttle Discovery on October 6, 1990. Its mission was, among other objectives, to measure the solar-wind pressure around the Sun, outside the ecliptic.

 In order to establish a high polar orbit, the spacecraft was aimed close to Jupiter, in order that Jupiter's large gravitational field would accelerate the spacecraft out of the ecliptic plane to high solar latitudes. The encounter with Jupiter occurred 14 months later, on February 8, 1992.

The Ulysses satellite flew three orbits around the Sun.

The first orbit began when the spacecraft encountered Jupiter. The resulting first orbit was completed 6 years later, in February 1998. The third orbit began 6 years after that, in February 2004. The spacecraft was turned off in August 2008, four and a half years into the last orbit. 

What we got back as data from the satellite gives us the first physically measured verification that the Sun is NOT an internally heated fusion-powered star, but is an electrically powered star, and that its operating environment is presently fast diminishing.

Ulysses saw the solar winds diminishing, while the Sun itself remained constant.

It measured a 30% reduction of the solar wind pressure over a span of 10 years. That's huge. The entire heliosphere that surrounds the solar system at a distance 100 times the distance of the Earth to the Sun, is getting measurably weaker as the result of the diminishing solar wind.

By looking deeper into the past, one can notice that the systemic weakening that Ulysses had measured, is actually not a new phenomenon. A general weakening had began already more than 3,000 years ago, with ups and downs along the way, according to what we can gleam from ice-core samples drilled from the Greenland ice sheet. The Ulysses satellite tells us, however, that the weakening has dramatically increased in modern time.

NASA's Ulysses satellite has also measured, correspondingly, a 20% increase in galactic radiation. This increase is precisely what one would expect as the result of the weakening of the solar winds. 

Thus, with two measured items of evidence supporting one another, the measurements tell us that the electrodynamic weakening of the solar system is real and is fast progressing. 

But why isn't this electric weakening reflected in a weaker Sun itself, when the Sun is electrically powered? Does the paradox disprove the electric-Sun theory? 

No it doesn't disprove it. It proves it. It adds instead one more item of proof. The proof lies in what the solar wind represents.

In electro-astrophysics, the solar wind comes to light as a feature of a regulating system that maintains the operation of the Sun at a tightly controlled level of intensity.

The solar wind phenomenon may be seen in terms of a tea kettle. The kettle is placed on a stove. The heat is on high. The kettle is venting off steam as it boils. It is elementary in chemistry that it is not possible to heat the water in the kettle to a temperature hotter than the boiling point. If one turns up the flame, the water in the kettle doesn't get hotter. The extra energy is devoted to producing more steam. 

In the electrodynamics of the cosmic system that powers our Sun, the solar wind can be likened to steam being boiled off from a kettle. The solar wind is the excess plasma that the regulating system lets go. The regulating feature keeps the Sun at a steady temperature. This means that when the input plasma density around the Sun diminishes, only the solar winds diminish, while the Sun itself remains constant in its operation.

This means that the solar wind pressure can be used as a measure of the effective power density in the supply line that is feeding into the the Sun at its reactive surface.

In this comparison the solar wind is the 'steam' that flows from the 'kettle.'

 If one turns the flame up, the kettle boils faster, and a stronger stream of steam comes out of it. If one turns the flame down, a weaker stream of steam results. By turning the flame down still further, one gets to the point when no steam at all is being produced. Should one reduce the flame even more, the water would get colder in the kettle. Below the boiling point the temperature of the water diminishes with the energy input. This comparison is significant.

Ulysses has measured 30% less 'steam' coming from the Sun over the span of 10 years. Now, 5 years further down this path, that solar wind pressure is likely reduced by 45% from what it had been in 1992 when the measurements started. 

Fifteen years from now, in the 2030 timeframe, the 'steam' flow will likely have diminished by a total of 90%. This means that we will have only 10% left then. And still, even at this highly diminished stage, we won't likely see the slightest change in the Sun's energy-radiation intensity. Only when the input energy drops below the point where solar winds are no longer ejected, will the Sun itself begin to diminish. This 'fading' would happen progressively from the 2030 timeframe onward. The Sun would still function at this point, but with a diminished intensity. When we get to this point, the weakening of the input streams, would of course continue. This means that we might not have much time left from this point on, before the Sun becomes inactive completely. When the supply factor gets diminished, the entire plasma-powered system begins to collapse. 

Hard Evidence: in electromagnetic dynamic-flow geometry.

Numerous experiments have been conducted in different locations and by different people, in exploring the electromagnetic processes in principle that cause interstellar plasma streams to be focused around a Sun, including with some astrophysical examples. While the discovered principles and their potential reflection in large cosmic examples, is but a construct of applied theories, real hard evidence does exist that verifies the discovered and theorized principles.

The theorized entry channels onto the Sun, by the focused plasma streams, have been verified by the Ulysses satellite in the polar regions of the Sun where the dense plasma streams should be located according to the discovered principles in laboratory experiments, which are too dense for the solar wind to penetrate. This means that the Ulysses satellite has provided hard evidence of the existence of the theorized Primer Fields based on laboratory experiments.

Since the magnetic dynamic-flow geometry is a function of the intensity of the flow, then, as the flow is diminishing, the resulting geometry reshapes itself accordingly, which affects the dynamic functioning of the system till a threshold is reached when the entire interlocked structure can no longer function and vanishes as if it had never existed. When this happens to the supply system for the Sun that powers its reactive system, the Sun will necessarily go inactive. It will become a dim star then, that glows by its residual energy and some nuclear decay within it.

Hard evidence in the magnetic pole drift.

By looking deeper into the past, one can notice that the systemic weakening that Ulysses had measured, is actually not a new phenomenon. A general weakening had began already more than 3,000 years ago, with ups and downs along the way, according to what we can gleam from ice-core samples drilled from the Greenland ice sheet. The Ulysses satellite tells us, however, that the weakening has dramatically increased in modern time.

While we did not have Ulysses taking measurements of the solar wind dynamics going back to the 1500s, for comparison, it is possible to reconstruct the historic pattern by the effect of the prevailing strength of the Primer Fields' magnetic field, modifying the Earth magnetic field.

The Earth creates a magnetic field around itself by the dynamo effects. While the mass of the Earth is predominantly electrically neutral, it is pervaded by significant amounts of plasma particles, which carry an electric charge. The Earth spinning on its axis, produces a moving electric current by the rotating mechanical effect. Moving electric 'currents' produce an magnetic field. The resulting magnetic field is generated perpendicular to the electric motion, so that the magnetic field becomes thereby aligned along the Earth spin axis. This means that without external influences, the Earth's magnetic poles would coincide perfectly with the poles of the spin-axis, which are the geographic North and South Poles.

However, the Earth is also subjected to the magnetic field of the Primer Fields that focus plasma around the Sun.

Since the two fields are offset by 23 degrees, by the tilt of the spin-axis, the Primer Fields modify the dynamo fields. The strong interaction by the Primer Fields, shifts the effective Magnetic Pole away from the Dynamo Pole, the Geographic Pole. Depending on the strength of the Primer Fields, the deflection sometimes exceeds 20 degrees. The theoretical maximum deflection would be 23.44 degrees according to the current inclination of the Earth's spin axis relative to the orbital ecliptic plane of the solar system that is oriented perfectly perpendicular to the Primer Fields magnetic orientation. 

The low-latitude location of the Magnetic Pole in 1904, tells us that the Primer Fields were extremely strong at this time, as the deflection of the Magnetic Pole, away from the Dynamo Pole, the Geographic Pole, was only 4 degrees off from the theoretical maximum - a strong Magnetic Pole shifting.

The location of the Magnetic Pole, shown in red, was determined by Canadian expeditions with on-the-ground measurements, magnetometers in 'hand,' to determine the location where the Earth's magnetic field lines were perfectly perpendicular. The marked locations are the epicentre of daily oscillations of the Magnetic Pole that shifts over a distance of up to 80 kilometers, as the Earth rotates under the Primer Fields. If the Dynamo magnetic field was perfectly symmetrical, and perfectly aligned to the Earth's axis, the oscillations would form a complete circle around the globe at the respective latitude. That they don't, indicates that the Dynamo magnetic field is asymmetric, and is more strongly generated under the continents, because of the greater absorption of plasma from space by the open landmasses. Above the ground, extending into space, the asymmetric anomalies combine, whereby the magnetosphere around the Earth is centered differently. It was centered on the northwest coast of Greenland in 2005, near the 80 degree latitude.

In 1904, the on-the-ground measured, North-South deflection over Canada, had shifted the magnetic North Pole far south to the 70 degree latitude. This strong deflection at the time indicates that the Primer Fields were strongly dominant at this time. 

From 1904 on, however, as the electric weakening in the solar system began, the deflection decreased at a constantly accelerating rate. The rate of change is indicated by the spacing of the blue dots that represent two-year increments.

By 2012 the weakening had become so extreme that the Magnetic North was deflected by only 4 degrees off the Geometric North, while the overall magnetic field of the Earth became correspondingly weaker. It is said that the Earth's magnetic field is the weakest now in hundreds of years. It may be the weakest since accurate measurements were first made.

The extreme weakening that is indicated by the 2012 close-approximation of the Magnetic Pole towards the North Pole, which is off the chart here, coincides in time with the big drought conditions that have begun to grip the world from 2012 on. The coincidence of the two indicates that both effects are the result of the same cause, the same electric weakening in the solar system.

The dramatic weakening of the solar winds that the Ulysses spacecraft had measured during the time span of its operation, coincides with the weakening of the Primer Fields that is reflected in the northward shifting of the Magnetic North Pole. Here, too, with the two physical measurements supporting one another, the coincidence points to a common cause.

However, what the Ulysses mission did not see, due to its short time span, is the accelerating rate of the electric weakening of the solar system that has occurred, which becomes apparent when it is seen in the wider historic timeframe. When the weakening trend that is observed in the wide time frame comes to light as an accelerating trend, rather than a linear trend, and the acceleration continues, then the collapse of the Primer Fields, and the Sun going inactive, may occur some time prior to the 2050 timeframe.

The accelerating trend that has become evident with the pole-shift trend, renders the linear projections towards the inactive Sun, shown here, to be highly conservative. The projection shown here is based on the short window of the Ulysses timeframe. This means that the unfolding reality is likely much more critical than is indicated here. It adds to the urgency of humanity beginning to respond to the Ice Age Challenge, which may be far-more critical than we would like it to be.

Hard evidence in dust

The analysis of ice samples drilled from the Antarctic ice sheet reveals large dust accumulations in the atmosphere over Antarctica, near the end of every glaciation cycle.

While the dust-phenomena over Antarctica, the most isolated spot on Earth, is not critical at the present, and is not relevant for determining the start of the next Ice Age, it is nevertheless interesting, as it illustrates the powerful effect that the Primer Fields have on the operation of the solar system, which becomes apparent dramatically when the Primer Fields become inactive.

The large dust accumulations that are found in the ice on Antarctica, typically begin half way through a glaciation period and extend for tens of thousands of years. The long duration precludes the potential that the dust resulted from volcanic action, nor does any evidence exist for large volcanic actions to have occurred, which would have dramatically raised the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, which did not occur. So, one needs to ask, what then would have caused the dust accumulation in Antarctica that is as far distant from the large landmasses on Earth as any place can be? The timing suggests that the dust is extraterrestrial in nature, and is related to the missing effect of the Primer Fields during the glaciation periods, that normally have a stabilizing effect on the orbital system of planets and asteroids.

The remarkable order among the planets, their near circular orbits, and their almost perfect geometric spacing with a near 'musical-scale' precision, is not without a cause, but is the result of the electromagnetic influence of the Primer Fields over long periods of time. Measured evidence suggests that the orbits of the planets are actively maintained by the dynamics of the electromagnetic system that shapes the solar system and determines its ecliptic.

It is interesting to note that the planets of our solar system obit at a mere 71% of the escape velocity that would apply for their orbital distance. This fact suggests that the orbits are electromagnetically supported in addition to the mass-gravity-velocity mechanics. This supporting influence, of course, is not active during most of the span of the long glaciation periods. As a consequence, the orbits will deteriorate, including those of the numerous types of objects in the asteroid belts. When this deterioration extends over tens of thousands of years, it becomes extremely likely that a large number of asteroids enter the Earth's atmosphere and disintegrate there.

If such was the case, we would see the asteroid intrusion continue until the Primer Fields become re-established, and their effect re-orders the orbital system. This is precisely the pattern we see indicated in the dust deposits in ice. The dust stops when an interglacial period begins. 

The evidence that we find in the dust in the Antarctic ice, stands as just one more item that illustrates the dynamics of the electric solar system as nothing else makes any sense for identifying the cause for the numerous observed phenomena. While the dust pattern do not tell how close we are to the start of the next Ice Age, it does illustrate monumentally the powerful effect that the Primer Fields have on everything, especially on the Sun and the Earth, and that the periodic collapsing of these fields is equally as dramatic in all respects.

Our cause for celebration.

Oh yes! Let's celebrate the coming Ice Age! 

Indeed, the call for celebration is not a paradox. The New Ice Age, that could start in 30 years time, gives us ample cause for celebration. 

Anything that promises even remotely to jolt us out of the death ritual that we have trapped ourselves into, at the present stage, is cause for celebration. The Ice Age Challenge provides this kind of an impetus.

The death trap has many aspects, which have one thing in common. They leave in the wake a defeated society. 

One face of the death trap is nuclear war. We have the equivalent destructive force of 500,000 Hiroshima-type tragedies hanging over our head. No one yet intends to eradicate this gigantic arsenal of death? To the contrary, evermore provocations are fielded against the world's great nations, and cries being heard that nuclear war is a winnable adventure.

Another aspect of insanity is the current world-depopulation policy of the western empire, that demands the reduction of humanity from the current seven billion people living on this planet to less than one billion. 

Towards the depopulation goal, vast quantities of food are being burned in automobiles, which would normally nourish 400 million people. In a world that has committed a billion people to chronic starvation, the biofuels food-burning is murdering, conservatively, 100 million people a year with starvation as surely as if they were executed, which amounts to the greatest ever genocide in history, a genocide so immense that it pales Hitler's holocaust into insignificance. 

This is a murder spree that everyone in the western world is actively participating in, who pulls up to the gas pump, feasting on biofuels.

The third aspect of insanity is the trap of greed-based tragedies, called economics, such as the imperial monetarism that is looting the nations and is wrecking the productive economies, shutting down industries, turning banks into gambling casinos that dwarf the world economy, eliminating health care and education except as profit centers, and so on. And those are only the worst examples.

If the Ice Age Challenge can begin to bring some measure of sanity into the current house of horrors, then the slightest step forward is worth a celebration. 

We may indeed get to this point, where a celebration is in order. NASA's Ulysses spacecraft saw a 20% increase in Galactic cosmic-ray flax during its 16 years of is operation, which appears to be beneficial to neurological and cognitive development.

This trend of increased neurological nourishment, especially as it is now increasing, may bring some light into the dismal landscape of the world where hope has been waning evermore. It may well be, then, that in the background to this new cosmic-ray trend, the kind of leadership will emerge that will shut down the house of horrors, and inspire the building of the critical Ice Age infrastructures that are essential for the survival of humanity.

Whether we get to this point where we can heartily celebrate the beginning of a New World, remains to be seen. Some steps of progress are already visible. Russia, China, and India are coming together as a development-block of nations, standing in opposition to the looting practice and depopulation goals of empire. And in Europe, France, Germany, and Italy, may find themselves pulling out of the EU empire for similar reasons.

Whether the world will succeed to free itself from the ancient trap of empire, and become free to respond to the Ice Age Challenge, will ultimately be a question of humanity's self-development in the years ahead. This development appears to be not latched to time. It typically takes off phenomenally when it becomes latched to truth.

And for the movements of truth, no inertia really exists. Once a truth is recognized, centuries of errors can become overturned in a moment. With the Ice Age transition adding some powerful incentives, and some neuronic nourishment, who knows what wonders can be achieved in changed perceptions and attitudes in the space of just moments, as we move ahead? Of course, nothing along this line is ever automatic. The essential footsteps need to be taken. In fact, they have become exceedingly critical.

Humanity at the crossroads.

Everything that was presented here tells us that humanity stands at the crossroads today.

A long time ago I wrote a science fiction novel that explores four different civilizations on four different planets, to explore the crossroads. One civilization didn't survive, another survived tragically, another developed like a star and became a light in the universe, and still another became what the Earth has the power to become right now. Which path we will choose for our future on Earth cannot be foreseen. All paths lay before us.

The choice is ours to make. The universe will not make this choice for us.

In the novel the choice is left open. In real life the choice cannot be omitted. Let us commit ourselves, therefore, to choosing life and a bright future, a future that we are able, as human beings, to create for ourselves with all things considered that our remarkable humanity that makes us the brightest stars of life on the planet, can accomplish.

Home page

Please consider a donation - Thank You

Published by Cygni Communications Ltd. North Vancouver, BC, Canada - (C) in public domain - producer Rolf A. F. Witzsche