Text and images transcript of the video New Ice Age Near 58 part evidence - 1 by Rolf Witzsche 

New Ice Age Near 58 part evidence - 1

Click on the images for a larger view

New Ice Age Near - 58 part evidence

(Comprehensive summery of evidence that we live in an electric universe in which ice ages happen and the next one starts in 30 years under an electric Sun becoming inactive.)

The original title was to be: The Sky is Falling. The title was meant to be shocking. When the general perception of our world lies so far off from what is actually real, so that reality becomes unbelievable, a shocking title would be warranted.

Of course the sky isn't falling, but the global temperature will be falling sharply when the ice age glaciation climate begins anew that has been the normal climate on earth for 85% of the last 2 million years.

A large body of evidence exists, that when it is seen as a whole in the context of causative principles, the composite indicates that the resumption of the glaciation climate will likely occur in the 2050s timeframe or sooner, and that the transition will be swift, possibly in the order of hours, days, or weeks, as the Sun goes 'inactive' with extremely dramatic consequences for all of humanity. 

Because the evidence is extensive, and concerns numerous aspects of science, this video has been created as a comprehensive summary. You may wish to refer to the transcript pages for this video for references to the more detailed explorations involved.

For a more-orderly summary, the video is divided into three parts.

Part 1 deals with paradoxes in general perception about the Ice Age phenomenon

Part 2 deals with astrophysical aspects that resolve the paradoxes

Part 3 deals with critical supporting evidence of the weakening solar system

Part 1 - Paradoxes in Ice Age perception

The Solar-Constant Paradox.

The general perception is, that the Sun is an invariable constant for all climate considerations. The evidence indicates that this perception is not correct.


We have evidence measured in historic ice deposits, of enormously fast global climate fluctuations that have occurred in the past, which are totally incompatible with the theory of a constant Sun. 


We have measured cold climates that were 40 to 50 times colder than the Little Ice Age had been, with fast transition times between them.


We also have measured evidence on hand, that enormous climate fluctuations have occurred all the way through the last half million years that we have evidence for from different exploration sites. 

The evidence is laid up in the great ice sheets in Antarctica, and in the ice of Greenland. Ice core samples have been examined from several drilling sites, both in Antarctica and in Greenland. The measurements from these widely separated sites all agree, within the limits of their resolution of details respective of the ice conditions. In considering the universal agreement of the measurements, one can assume that the measurements are essentially correct, even though, what they tell us, turns the conventional perception of solar dynamics upside down.

The same evidence that is found in ice cores, is even found in deep-sea sediments. The results all tell the same story. They tell a story for which no real theory exists, since it is assumed by a fundamental doctrine that our Sun is an invariable star with a constant energy output. In other words, the evidence and the theory do not agree by a long way. For a while the paradox was all blamed on orbital variations. However, the computed results of the variations, don't agree with the evidence either. No part of the measured evidence agrees with any theory, since all science perceptions are constricted by the Doctrine of the Constant Sun.


In some cases the evidence tells us that the Earth warmed up from deep glacial conditions to near interglacial conditions in the space of just three decades. More than 20 such events have been detected in the ice deposits in Greenland from the last glacial period going back in time roughly 120,000 years. Numerous exotic theories have been invented to bring the measured evidence into conformity with the, Doctrine of the Constant Sun, that is widely accepted. 

However when one examines the modern climate theory based on the constant Sun, one finds a striking similarity on all cases in this theory, with Ptolemy's exotic theories in astronomy, in adherence to doctrines, of epicycles and so forth, with which Ptolemy delivered some amazingly elegant 'scientific' proof of something that doesn't actually exist.

To solve the paradox, the orbital cycles theory was invented, named the Milankovitch Cycles theory, according to its main contributor. The theory is an elegant exotic example of climate theories that are constricted from the outset by the Doctrine of the Constant Sun.

When one is boxed in like this, one has little to work with that is based on the reality outside the doctrine. That's the type of box that Ptolemy was restricted to in astronomy. He achieved marvels in this box, and so did Milankovitch whose achievement rivals in quality Ptolemy's work.

Ptolemy's calculations, forged by the box of doctrines, came extremely close to agreeing with the actual physical measurements, though they came not close enough.


The calculations of the Milankovitch Cycles are actually further off the track from the physically measured reality than Ptolemy was. 

Of course, in the time of Milankovitch, the ice core historic data did not exist, for comparison. But this data exists now, and it doesn't match up by a long way.

Sometimes the measured results precede the computed, theorized cause by tens of thousands of years, and sometimes they lag by just as long. This means that greater forces are at work to produce the ice age cycles that are not mechanistically definable, but which are so large that the orbital cycles become consequential to them.


In spite of the elegance in reasoning to correlate the celestial dynamics with what is in the box of the mechanistic, which on the surface actually makes sense to some degree, when seen from within the box, the orbital cycles theory ultimately fails, because it fails to consider that the total exposure of the Earth to the Sun remains always the same regardless of the cyclical variations of the tilt of the spin axis and its orientation, and the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit, which together only affect seasonal differences and hemispheric differences, but are never expressed as global differences.


One of the main arguments for the orbital cycles theory is, that an Ice Age may occur as the result of extreme seasonal and hemispheric distribution of the solar energy received, even though the total energy received remains the same. However, no measured evidence exists that hemispheric climate shifting has any significant effect, much less the gigantic effects that can cause the enormous ice ages that we have evidence of. All measured evidence indicates that the Ice Age effects, when they do occur, are simultaneously global in all respects.


All of this put together means that no rational theory actually exists in support of the various types of Ice Age evidence, including the fact that during the last glaciation condition the ocean level became lowered by 400 feet as evaporated water was piled up on land in the form of ice sheets more than 10,000 feet deep, and that permafrost had reached as far south as Beijing, and the winter sea ice had reached as far as Los Angeles. 

These enormously severe climate conditions do not occur without a correspondingly large cause. And this enormously large and ever changing cause is fundamentally inconsistent with the Theory of the Constant Sun, which is the current theory that rules astrophysical science. 

However, the observed and measured evidence, and its numerous corroborating types of evidence of enormous climate events, do make all perfect sense suddenly, the moment that one breaks through the barrier erected by the Doctrine of the Constant Sun.

When this breakthrough is made, the Ice Age paradoxes all become resolved.

 Part 2 - The Astrophysical Paradoxes

The Variable Sun appears to be the greatest science challenge of our time.

The only type of variable Sun that is physically possible within the framework of the known or knowable physical principles, and is extensive enough in its expression to match the Ice Age evidence, is the electric Sun.

This sun is electrically powered within a sphere of strongly concentrated interstellar plasma, that is focused on it electromagnetically by a system of self-forming Primer Fields. Such a sun, being electrically powered with nuclear fusion occurring on its surface, can meet all the requirements for causing the ice ages, and related evidence.

In comparison, the widely accepted theory of the Sun, the internally-powered Sun theory, actually affirms that it is bankrupt on this account, by stating emphatically that the internally powered Sun is a constant factor that simply cannot change. 

It is theorized that it takes up to 30 million years for heat flux from this Sun's core to work its way to the surface, or up to 170,000 years for the fast thermal flux in the form of photons to cross the 700,000 kilometre distance from the center of this Sun, to the surface. 


The slow heat-transfer theory, of course, affords no basis for even the well known 11 years solar-activity cycles to exist, during which the Sun's energy output in the high UV band varies by a factor of 20. This variance has been measured, even photographed. What we see here is a totally natural phenomenon for an externally powered electric Sun, but an impossibility for an internally heated Sun with a slow oozing heat transfer mechanism. The evidence that we see here is typical for an electric Sun with surface reactions that rapidly respond to resonating external electric conditions.

Electromagnetic processes are inherently variable processes. The intensity of the expression of the operating principles, always varies with the density of the input energy that is driving the processes.

In the electric universe, the Sun can be seen as existing within a large electromagnetic structure that concentrates interstellar plasma streams and focuses the pumped-up plasma onto the Sun.

The process results into a dense plasma sphere surrounding the Sun. 

The dynamics of the electromagnetic structure has been explored in detail by the researcher David LaPoint, who has termed the structure, the Primer Fields. 

David LaPoint has explored the basic structure of the Primer Fields with a series of static experiments, in order to explore the details of the electromagnetic geometry that has been discovered in high-energy electric flow experiments, as shown in the example here, produced at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, presented by Anthony Paratt, director of experiments at the time.

The static experiments have revealed the existence of a magnetic confinement dome.

The confinement dome facilitates the concentration of plasma flowing into the system, from which the plasma becomes focused onto a sun. 

David LaPoint has also discovered that if the confined density exceeds the magnetic retention strength, some of the excess escapes through the weakest point of the confinement dome. Examples in space exist, for the resulting feature. The feature is of great value as it keeps the plasma pressure that is focused onto the Sun relatively steady, within certain limits, under normal conditions, as if the Sun was indeed a universal constant.


The same Primer Fields principle also unfolds on the surface of the Sun, where the concentrated plasma surrounding the Sun is further concentrated to a density that enables nuclear fusion to occur, which in this case would be electrically powered cold fusion on the surface of the Sun.

The resulting fusion process produces some mild thermal heating along the way, by the actions that cause nuclear fusion to occur. The heating in the process raises the surface of the Sun to 5,505 degrees Celsius, which falls well within the range of electric discharge temperatures. 

The 5,505 degree fusion heat is extremely low, in the way that the nuclear-fusion process is theorized. The reason for this low temperature resulting from the fusion on the Sun, is that the fusion is electrically powered, rather than being thermally forced, as in the standard fusion theory, and is attempted in thermo-nuclear-fusion reactors on Earth, for which millions of degrees of temperature are required to cause any form of fusion to happen. 

On the Sun, nuclear fusion happens naturally, and effortlessly. And above all, it operates as an atom-synthesizing fusion that creates all the atomic elements in the periodic table. 

The Sun, all by itself, thereby delivers proof that we live in an electric universe. 

And yes, we do have ample evidence that synthesizing nuclear fusion is occurring on the surface of the Sun.

All of these atomic elements, listed here, have been detected to be present in the atmosphere of the Sun, in the ratio shown here. If they were not synthesized on the surface of the Sun, they wouldn't be there.


The known presence of a wide range of basic atomic elements in the solar atmosphere is proof that synthesizing nuclear fusion results from the solar process, and that this is happening at the surface, not inside the Sun.

If the fusion would happen inside the Sun, the Sun would have retained the heavy elements at its core. Nor would it be possible for the Sun to produce these elements under the standard model, since the Sun is deemed to be a hydrogen fusion engine that combines hydrogen only into helium, and takes the process no further. The detected wide range of elements in the solar atmosphere simply should not exist under the standard solar model.

In the electric Sun model, however, where intense, electrically powered nuclear fusion takes place on the surface, the entire spectrum of elements is expected to being synthesized there, and in the ratio that is typical for the cosmic abundance of them in the solar system.

It is not surprising therefore that the ratio of elements detected in the solar atmosphere matches closely the known ratio for these elements in the cosmic abundance table. If these elements wouldn't be constantly synthesized at the surface of the Sun, they wouldn't exist in the Sun's atmosphere. But they do exist there, and they get carried away from there, by the solar winds. The close matching of the solar ratio with that of the abundance table suggests, that all the atomic elements that the planets of the solar system are made of, where synthesized on the surface of the Sun, rather than having been forged eons ago, during a brief instant of the mythical Big Bang explosion that supposedly created the universe.


The very fact, therefore, that we all exist, and that the planets exist, is evidence that the Sun is an electric powered star that over time has synthesized all the atomic elements that the planets are made of. 

An internally powered, entropic Sun, does not have the capability to cause atomic synthesis.

Such a sun would therefore have no planets. Not a single solar system would exist, attached to such a Sun.

It may be for this reason that the entropic camp in astrophysical science has developed the Big Bang theory, according to which all the atoms in the universe were instantly created in a giant explosion, from which the galaxies were formed by accretion, over time, through gravitational condensation. 

The internal-fusion theory, that is built on the Big Bang model, is dangerously entropic in that it envisions a universe that is powered by gravity-forced processes in which the universe is deemed to be consuming itself towards it eventual energy death. The acceptance of entropy as a universal principle, in which nothing is created and everything is consumed, is a dangerous fairy tale, because the tale has become subsequently accepted in economics, culture, philosophies, politics, and even in science itself. While the entropic Big Bang theory is self-evidently impossible in the real world, it does have the effect that it lulls the human spirit, even astrophysical science, to sleep. Of course, no evidence exists that the impossible has happened. The red-shift in light from distant galaxies, which is cited as evidence for the Big Bang theory, actually disproves the theory.

In the entropic, Big Bang fairy dream, the Earth is once again regarded as the center of the universe, with the universe expanding around us, with growing distances everywhere, in a flow that we've got caught up in.

That's a nice tale, but not reality. The red-shift phenomenon that has been discovered in light from distant planets, which, it is said, proves that all galaxies are racing away from us into all directions, doesn't prove anything, but the opposite. It is theorized that the faster an object recedes from us, the observer, the more is the emitted light from the moving source being stretched out. It is said that the greater the red-shift is, the more has the light been stretched out, and the faster are the most distant galaxies are racing away from us.

That's the key to the Big Bang theory. But is this true?

According to the Big Bang origin theory, the most distant galaxies must be receding the fastest, as if to prove that the entire universe was forged in one place at one time. That's a tale typical for bedtime stories, but in the morning the universe comes to light as a more rational place.

In the electric universe, the measured red-shift that has been observed from distant objects doesn't prove at all that the galaxies that originated the light are racing away from us.

The red-shift becomes understood as merely the result of a minuscule energy-loss during the light's propagation over long distances, through the plasma-rich intergalactic space. The energy-loss that is incurred along the way, is proportionally to the distance the light has crossed, whereby the light assumes a lower-energy state.

In the electric theory of the universe, the photons, which are the carriers of light, are moving points of energy that are surrounded by an electromagnetic field that give light its 'shape.'

The combination of many shapes in motion creates a moving electromagnetic wave. 

However, not all shapes are of the same size. The differences in size determines the colour of the light. The movement of these fields, as an electromagnetic wave, determines the frequency by the size of the fields. The high-energy fields, which are more tightly packed internally, come out smaller in size. 

The different sizes, when strung together, create different wavelengths in their motion. 

Now, when light is propagated over long distances, such as millions and billions of light years, a gradual energy-loss is incurred along the way. The gradual energy-loss along the way results in larger electromagnetic fields, and thereby longer wavelengths. For example, the blue fields decay into the shape of the green fields, and the green fields decay into the shape of the yellow fields. In short, all the light-fields decay towards the red. The red itself decays into infrared. A shift towards the red, or red-shift for short, of all the light across the entire spectrum results from the gradual energy-loss in light propagation over long distances.

The measured red-shift from distant objects, results from that. It is simply a measure for distance, instead of a measure of speed of separation.

The red-shift cannot be used as an absolute measure, however, as the energy-loss varies with the density of the material in cosmic space that the transmitted light encounters. 

The recognition of what the red shift really represents invalidates the Big Bang theory, which is built on the red-shift phenomenon. The recognition of what the red shift represents invalidates everything that the false theory, the Big Bang theory, has 'inspired'. And this has immense implications, because at the heart of the Big Bang theory stands the Doctrine of Entropy. The doctrine states that everything in the universe careens towards an inevitable end, as its energy stores are exhausted. Under this theory every sun burns itself out. This doctrine is applied to everything. It states that every economy careens towards its collapse; every financial system dies in debt; every nation falls into fascism; and even humanity as a whole is doomed to collapse by its increasing population that demands too many resources, so that the world must be depopulated. But the Doctrine of universal Entropy is false. The universe operates on an opposite platform, a platform of continuous development. Not a single sun burns itself out by consuming itself. The universe is dynamically self-powered, and likewise is humanity, which lives by created resources, and will do so for evermore.


The liberation from the Big Bang Doctrine of Entropy sets us free to discover how the Sun really operates, and how it can be a variable star, which the ice ages indicate it really is. Nor should the Ice Age glaciation be seen as an entropic consequence. An ice age is but a shift to a different environment that appears to be critical for human development, because humanity didn't develop itself on this planet until the modern Ice Age Epoch, the Pleistocene Epoch, began. And this too, is tightly linked to changing electrc conditions in our electric universe.

During an Ice Age, increased cosmic-ray flux is reaching the Earth and is affecting humanity. Cosmic rays are fast moving protons, which carry an electric charge. As they pass through the human body, they don't collide with anything, but they create a magnetic field that induces an electric current. The induced current may have a beneficial effect for the neurological system of the human body, which functions electrically. Humanity is definitely anti-entropic. We are in the process of developing, just as the universe continues to develop.

The electric universe is an endlessly developing universe. It is a construct of basic principles that apply in various contexts everywhere, from the Sun in the large context, to the photon in the smallest, with the neurological miracles of life in-between. The evidence that the universe is electrically organized on all levels is so widely apparent that the term, theory, no longer really applies, because the evidence speaks for itself.

Only when we look at the universe from the standpoint of entropic philosophy, do we find ourselves boxed in with paradoxes. Those paradoxes, for which no solutions exist under the numerous false theories, typically inspire some rather exotic excuses for anything to make sense in the box. However, as the Big Bang theory illustrates, the exotic excuses ultimately don't make any sense either. 

So it is, that since there exists only one type of universe, not two with opposite characteristics, we need to get out of the box and come to terms with what is real. Only one type of universe can be real. Either the Electric Universe is real - which is self-existing and self-maintaining, which all known evidence illustrates - or the entropic Big Bang dream is real, where only mass and gravity is recognized with exotic theories attached, for which no actual evidence exists. The choice shouldn't be hard.

 If the Big Bang dream is real, then all of what you see and are, is an accretion of dust that was magically created in a moment of primordial explosion 13.8 billion years ago.

According to the Big Bang theory, all the protons, neutrons, and electrons, and so on, of the entire universe, were formed in one place in the first one-millionth of a second of the explosion, which then was driven apart by a gravity shockwave that is said to be still expanding. 

In this context of the empty box, the electric force of the universe is omitted as a factor, though it is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity and its effects. By this omission, which makes the box rather empty and useless, the Big Bang theory renders itself as but an empty dream, and likewise everything that is built on this dream..

In the real universe the creative process is continuously unfolding. The physical evidence that we see in our solar system tells us that all atomic elements that make up the planets were electrically synthesized on the surface of the Sun in a still-ongoing dynamic process that we have physically measured the result of.

The alpha fusion chain that is illustrated here in simplified form, illustrates the basic process that has formed the planets over long periods, all forged from basic plasma, powered by in intense electric interaction. The entire solar system, as we see it today, was likely produced rather quickly over a few million years while the Sun itself was formed from concentrated plasma streams near the center of the galaxy in the highest plasma-dense region. The creative process for the solar system is illustrated in the distribution of atomic elements across the different planets, understood as flowing from the Sun.


The distribution pattern proves that we live in an electrically powered universe in which a sun is the synthesizing engine that produces, in surface nuclear fusion, all the atomic elements that the planets are made of. The distribution is necessarily uneven. The heavier elements are evidently the first to fall out, from the solar winds that carry them, by gravitational attraction, and so on.

This means that the heavy, rocky planets with metallic cores and the heaviest gases in the atmosphere, are located nearest to the Sun, while the planets of the lighter elements are formed farther away. It is evidently for this reason that the atmosphere of Venus is made up almost entirely of CO2, a heavy gas with the combined atomic weight of 44. 

In this context the Earth would have captured most of the atomic nitrogen and oxygen, which are somewhat lighter in atomic weight. Since most of the oxygen produced on the Sun would have been combined along the way, with hydrogen from the Sun, to form water, the fallout of water would have to be strongly apparent on the Earth and the planets nearby extending as far as Saturn that has rings and moons made of accumulated water ice.

The fallout of the much 'lighter' hydrogen and helium atoms, evidently begins most strongly at a greater distance from the Sun.

Here the giant gas planets are formed, with Jupiter capturing most of the helium and hydrogen atoms, and Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune becoming progressively smaller thereafter. This distribution ratio all by itself disproves the Big Bang theory and proves that we live in an electric universe with an electric Sun that synthesizes atomic elements at its surface by electric fusion. 

The unique distribution of the elements in the solar system, that has been discovered with extensive exploration missions, only makes sense with the Sun being the synthesizing source for the distributed elements. 

Measurements also tell us that the ratio of atomic elements existing in the solar 'atmosphere,' matches closely the theorized ratio published as the global abundance table. 

The distribution pattern of the atomic elements flowing away from the sun, which is thereby evident as the synthesizing source, adds one more item of proof that we live in an electrically powered universe. 

Of course, the universe doesn't end at our doorstep, nor do its principles and their manifestations end here.


The distribution of synthesized atomic elements is evidently not confined to the solar system exclusively, especially in the case when larger stars produce larger amounts of synthesized atomic elements that are electrical neutral and are thereby free flowing, and flowing off into space far past their respective solar systems.. Some of the larger stars form clouds of gas and dust around them, and flowing away from them.

In the case of extremely large stars, and entire clusters of stars, the resulting clouds of synthesized atomic elements take on gigantic proportions. It is widely believed in entropic science that these clouds are remnants of exploding stars. But if one looks closer, they all have super-active giant stars still at their center, or associated with the massive clouds of synthesized gases and heavy elements, termed dust.

Enormously large clouds of synthesized elements have accumulated over time near clusters of super-giant stars, as in the case shown here. Some of the giant clouds have remained largely stable. Other clouds have been seen expanding with the typical speeds of flowing solar winds.


In some cases the synthesized giant clouds also reveal the tell-tale geometry of the plasma flow structures that form them, as the geometry has been discovered in plasma-flow experiments in laboratories, such as the one shown here derived from experiments at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

In the case of some smaller giant stars, the double-bowl geometry of the Primer Fields that focus plasma onto a sun, remains still visible. The two large scale examples illustrate visibly the active plasma geometry of the Primer Fields that focus plasma unto a sun, including our Sun.


In the case of our solar system, the plasma currents are too weak to be visible. However, the plasma inflow geometry has been physically verified by NASA's Ulysses spacecraft in the form of the measured interruptions of the solar wind in the areas where the plasma inflow to the Sun would be located. What we see measured, delivers physical proof that our local star, the Sun, is unmistakably, an electric star.


The evidence that synthesizing fusion is still happening on the surface of the Sun, is also seen in the phenomenon of the noctilucent clouds, which are clouds of water ice in the upper stratosphere up to 80 kilometers above the surface. Water vapor, which is heavy, isn't lifted up as high as to the very edge of the atmosphere. However, in the electric solar system where atomic elements and molecules flow from the Sun, pervading interstellar space, the existence of water ice at the edge of the Earth's atmosphere, is extremely natural.


The rings of Saturn are similarly composed of water ice. They are items of proof that we live in an electric solar system. The water for the rings was evidently accumulated over long periods as deposits from the Sun. 

The high water concentration in the Saturn system is further evident in Saturn's moons. The entire moon, Dione, is made up almost entirely of water ice.

The same high concentration of water ice is found on the moon, Tethye, which is another one of the moons of Saturn. These giant moons are made of ice from water that originated at the Sun in the form of hydrogen and oxygen, which evidently combined into water along the way. Saturn proves with its moons that we live in an electric universe, under an electric Sun, as no other cause can create the kind of phenomena we see.


Of course it is also fairly evident by simply looking at the Sun, that the Sun is not internally heated. By looking through the umbra of the sunspots, at what lies below the shiny surface, we see a dark and cold interior. What we see isn't a paradox in the electric sun model. It is expected there. It is a paradox only in the internally heated fusion model, which is contradicted thereby.


The internally heated fusion model also contradicts itself by its very premise. For the internally forced hydrogen fusion to occur in the Sun, the Sun needs to be a sphere of atomic hydrogen gas, but which is not physically possible. The enormous gravity of a gas sphere the size of the Sun, would crush the atoms that it would be made of. And even if it was possible for such a gigantic gas sphere to exist, the resulting, extremely compressed gas, would make the Sun up to a thousand times heavier that it actually is. 

The extremely light weight, in mass-density comparison with Jupiter and Saturn, that the Sun is known to have, renders the Sun a plasma sphere that is diffused by the force of electric-repulsion, a force that is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity, which would enable a sun of its size to exist, as well as any other imaginable size, even super-massive stars. 


For example, Stars with a mass 150 times greater than the mass of the Sun, have been located, like the stars in the R136 Cluster. It takes a giant leap of faith to believe that these gigantic spheres of atomic gases can exist without its atoms being crushed by the ensuing gravity. The largest of these, R136a1 is believed to be 300 times more massive than the Sun.

The very existence of such giant stars proves that the stellar universe is electrically powered as no other reasonable option exists for these giants to be formed.

Just look at a simple size comparison, like the one shown here. Using a combination of instruments on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope, astronomers have discovered the most massive stars to date, some weighing more than 300 times the mass of the Sun, or twice as much as the previously accepted limit of 150 solar masses. This artist's impression presented here shows the relative sizes that are known for stars, from the smallest 'red dwarfs', weighing in at about one tenth the mass of the Sun, through the low mass “yellow dwarfs” such as the Sun is regarded to be, ranging up to the massive “blue dwarf” stars weighing eight times more than the Sun, and from there to the 300 solar mass super giants, like the one named R136a1. Plasma spheres of this supergiant size are inherently possible, while gas spheres are not, except in the imagination. The very fact that this wide range of stars exists, renders every sun to be an electrically powered star, based on the same universal principle. It is a well proven fact that electric phenomena are possible on almost any scale. Some stellar principles can be replicated even in the laboratory.

The stellar physics concepts of the entropic star cycles, are concepts that are boxed into recognizing nothing but gravity-forced reactions. The box is largely empty, as it takes 99.999% of the universe, which exists in plasma form, out of the theoretical considerations. What comes out of the largely empty box is a distorted view of the universe. The distortion may have a political motive standing behind it. It is a well-established fact that every system of empire, regardless of its form, forces entropic conditions onto the economies the system of empire controls and exploits. The imperial system champions the concept of the entropy as a closed in system of thinking in which everything is winding down to an inevitable depletion of its very substance. This may be the reason why the Big Bang theory was hastily promoted at the time when the electric universe theory was beginning to unfold, to counter-act it. The successful promotion, however, does not mean that the politically motivated distortion of science is correct.

Home page

Please consider a donation - Thank You

Published by Cygni Communications Ltd. North Vancouver, BC, Canada - (C) in public domain - producer Rolf A. F. Witzsche