The logic for re-instating Glass Steagall is irrefutable, is it not?
The Glass Steagall law was repealed in the USA in 1999, with the force of an
immense movement of slander and insane promises, supported by bribery funds in
the range of hundreds of millions of dollars, to legalize theft on the large
financial front - the private right to steal, and to deny the right of
government to block the private right to steal from society.
Glass Steagall was a
protective law designed to prevent the grand thievery by clever tricks of
financial derivatives schemes that are basically fraud, etc., called profit.
Since Glass Steagall was repealed the world financial system has been
spectacularly collapsed, and this so deeply by the legalized thievery that up to
$50 trillion in bailout funds had to be flooded into the feeding trough for the thievery,
in order to keep the dying thievery system alive. The logic for re-instating
Glass Steagall is glaringly obvious thereby. Nevertheless, in spite of years of
efforts to restore the Glass Steagall law, no success has been realized on this
front of society protecting itself.
Is the failure for moving on this front
really the result of the hold that the U.S. President Obama has on Congress as
some claim is the case? Or is it, that the majority of Congress is still imprisoned into the mythological concepts of monetarist mechanics, which, as the maters of empire have dictated for centuries, is
deemed to be the only economic platform possible. With this oligarchic
monetarist doctrine, by which money is deemed to be wealth, which can be acquired by stealing,
the masters of empire have sucked the creative life out of society. In fact, no other platform is allowed to
exist anywhere, except that which sucks the life out of society. It is hard for a people who are locked into this prison of hollowed-out mythological perceptions to break themselves free.
You should be able to judge yourself how difficult it is to break out of this prison of hollowed out perceptions that are purely mythological in
nature. You are experiencing the paradox yourself as the cherished LaRouche science basement team
remains locked into exactly this type of prison, a prison of hollowed-out perceptions that has been imposed on science for
centuries and for the same reason that monetarism has been imposed on economics.
The trap that the basement team is fiercely protecting, by promoting it, is evident in
the mechanistic cosmology that the team champions, in which only gravity is allowed as a perceptual
basis for understanding the universe, regardless of the fact that gravity is the weakest force
there is, a mechanistic force of limited reach, while the actual dynamic force
that renders the universe anti-entropic, is ruled out of existence. In this
oligarchic prison in which the real controlling and powering force of the universe is blocked
out of the domain of science, the strangest mythological concepts come into existence as default alternatives, like Ptolemy’s epicycles.
Ptolemy was locked into a doctrine that forced astronomy to see the cosmos built as constructs of perfect circles, which he managed to do with the aid of the mythological epicycles and
his concept of the equant. Kepler enabled astronomy to break out of this prison by recognizing the principle of gravity as an ordering governing force expressed in the solar system.
Since the principle of gravity was out of the bag from then on, it was allowed to exist in the domain of science, while any further intrusion of reality into the prison that science
remained locked into, was furiously prevented under the Wellsian and Fabian doctrine,
as it still does, which demands science to be kept small, hollowed-out, and as much as possible, impotent.
Thus, the queen of science, cosmology, is condemned to see a universe that is ruled
exclusively by gravity, which the LaRouche Science Basement Team conveniently bows to, because that’s how the domain of science is presently
operating, under the Wellsian and Fabian doctrine. On this basis science has become tied into knots with a concept of the universe in which only gravity is allowed to
be recognized as an operating force, just as monetarism is the only platform that is allowed to
recognized as valid in economics.
In cosmology everything must be understood as the mechanistic result of the
force of gravity. In this prison truly exotic theories have been developed, to explain the otherwise inexplicable,
just as Ptolemy had done with his epicycles. In the modern world the epicycles have become the exotic theories that
are designed to make the gravity-only universe perceptional, like with the
theory of the density waves, and black holes, dark matter, dark energy, and the all-combining Big Bang
theory, none of which are supported by verifiable universal physical principles.
Everything is mythological here. The economic equivalent is on the same path.
Monetarism is mythological and not supported by any verifiable universal
The modern congressmen, senators, businessmen, and much of society with them, are locked into the same type of
perceptional prison. In this particular case, only monetarism is allowed as a ruling force, and
is therefore deemed the only reality in economics. This prison is carefully guarded against the intrusion of
any notion of an actual real economic principle, such as the Credit Society principle.
The monetarist prison too, is fiercely guarded and hard to break out of, as hard
as the prison is to break out of where science has been drained of any notion that the 99.999% of the mass of the universe
does exist as electrically charged plasma that responds not only to gravity, but
also to the electric force that is 36 orders of magnitude stronger than the
force of gravity, and does not diminish with the square of the distance as gravity does.
On the plasma platform science has no need for density waves, black holes, dark energy, and the entropy of the Big Bang theory. All the observed phenomena are easily recognized as lawful electric phenomena with built-in vast potentials for human economic development. Unfortunately the breakout to the freedom that comes with this unfolding wider perception of reality, is a fiercely
prevented to the very day, as the breakout from the same type of prison is, that monetarism
is for economics.
Thus, the modern scene, even at the leading edge, has become highly hypocritical. The LaRouche organization is saying
in essence to the senators and congressmen, “you fools, why can’t you break out of the prison of monetarism that you have become trapped into,” while in the same breath it defends its own imprisonment into the prison of hollowed out science.
The movement on the Glass Steagall front will most likely remain blocked by the impotence that always results from hypocrisy.
The blocking factor really is located here. If the blocking factor was removed, the horizon would instantly be opened to a vast new industrial-revolution renaissance that science,
when unlocked from its prison, would inspire. But this isn't happening, is it?
As a consequence we remain stuck.
Without the step of breaking ourselves free in science, which unfortunately
isn't even on the horizon, what would inspire the congressmen and senators to break out of their prison
of monetarism that they have been comfortable in for all their life, even if the conditions within are getting worse by the day?
That's something to think about, isn't it?
Here is some more about the type of prison that science has been locked into. The link below
links to a transcript page of one of my educational video presentations where the subject of imprisoned perception is being dealt with.
Oligarchic Doctrine for Science