CERN: research designed to fail - Rolf A. F. Witzsche

 

'Active' Research


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN

Fascist Research?

 

The Nazi death camps are infamous examples for conducting 'active' research.. They would face off a mother and her child, each with a switch to deliver a painful electric shock to the other, with a 'researcher' having a switch for each, with which he would force the mother and child into unnatural reactions, typically until the death of one of them, of both. That's 'active' research. A lot of this type of deeply painful and deadly 'active research' has been imposed on society throughout history. 
See: Active Research in the Political World

Some of the 'active research' mania has spilled over into the sciences with equally devastating consequences for society.

'Active research' in the sciences is presently conducted by some of the world's most prestigious high-energy physics labs. It is carried out in numerous different ways. 

The "High-frequency Active Aurora Research Project" (HAARP) is operated by the U.S. Navy and Air Force, that defines its activity as 'active research.' It produces unnatural conditions in the Earth's ionosphere to observe its response. The project employs high-power inputs for heating the ionosphere with radio waves. Then researchers observe the resulting 'squirming' with an eye open for reactions that might be useful for military and political application. That's an example of a type of research in which dramatic actions are taken to force unnatural conditions, which are then studied. 

The resulting tragedy is that this type of research does not reveal how the Universe and the human being naturally function. Such projects are dead-end pursuits in terms of their beneficial usefulness, and are therefore by intention designed to fail. Science is by its defining concept a search for knowledge of how the Universe functions and is designed to function. There is no productive benefit gained in researching how it does not function, such as exploring how a mother and child kill each other under extreme, unnatural, forced, circumstances. This is the kind of research that CERN is designed to conduct with the Universe.

The policy for driving science into a dead-end pursuit, to disable its natural effectiveness, reflects the core policy of Paolo Sarpi, the reformer of the Venetian Empire back in the 16th Century. Sarpi had recognized that the freedom in society that unfolds with scientific and technological development, which had begun in the north of Europe, posed a threat to the very foundation of empire that has no natural basis to exist. Since he recognized that the nature of science is progressive, and that as such that it cannot be kept bottled up, he developed a policy to allow science to some extend, but in a controlled manner, to thereby to hinder it by all means available. It was likely for this policy that he directed the expansion of the Venetian Empire northward, into the Netherlands and England to put a lid onto the scientific development there, and of course to exploit the disabled scene. 

The policy of thus grinding society into the ground became later a core feature of the Fabian Society of the new empire in the north. The Fabian Society appropriately named itself, according to its core policy direction, after the Roman general Quintus Maxiums Fabius who gained his fame for his policy of not confronting an enemy, but grinding an enemy into the ground by subversive means, causing constant attrition. Fabious had defeated the vastly superior forces of Hannibal that way. This method is evidently became a key component in the struggle of empire to maintain its existence that has no natural foundation, and to survive in a developing world by pulling the world down around it. The famous author H. G. Wells loved the Fabian's effort, except he thought it was not radical enough, especially in respect to the grinding down of science as his novel The Time Machine illustrates.

The devolution of culture and science is still a key element in the political word for the same goal, even though this goal is ultimately impossible to achieve. For this reason the pull-down attempts to throttle scientific progress have become evermore exotic as a means to hinder the natural unfolding of science. We find three world famous projects in this arena. These are projects that are celebrated the world over as leading-edge science projects, some with high hopes pinned on them. But they all have two features in common. They are built on creating and exploring conditions that do not naturally exist in the Universe, and they are all centered on the intentionally created false assumption that the Universe is a closed, entropic, self-consuming system of random forces and is winding down towards an energy void and its ultimate disintegration, whereby it is deemed natural that all good things eventually come to an end. The so-created axiomatic trap presently threatens the very existence of civilization. We find it reflected in policies that support the imperial ideology of devolution, impotence, poverty, austerity, insanity, genocide, and so forth that hail depopulation (forced genocide) as a panacea. The CERN project, research conducted at high-energy physics lab of the European Organization for Nuclear Research, (CERN) is of this type.

The fundamental goals at CERN

At CERN  attempts are made to apply enormous force to overpower two of the most fundamental forces of the Universe, in order to observe the 'squirming' of the Universe under the forced unnatural conditions, the very conditions that the Universe has created principles for to prevent from occurring. 

Numerous studies have been planned based on experimentally accelerating two proton beams to the speed of light and then smash them into each other from opposite directions in other to overpower the conditions that cause the light-speed limit. It is hoped that in this overpowered condition the accelerated protons will collide, which the Universe has created powerful natural principles to keep meticulous separated from each other. The goal is to overpower this principle and smash the protons (one of the basic building blocks of all the atoms in the Universe) with unnatural velocity into each other that they will break apart, which are held together by the absolute strongest force in the Universe, the "nuclear strong force." 

When this nuclear strong-box is broken, it is hoped that the violence involved will scatter the constituent parts of the protons, the sub-atomic particles called quarks that are held together by the nuclear strong-force, the strongest force, and it is further hoped that in the scattering debris a theorized particle can be located that is deemed to give all matter in the Universe its quality of mass, which according to current theories a proton should not have. For this purpose a truly gigantic physics experiment has been devised, the largest that has ever been built, which has recently been completed and is operational at half its designed power capacity. 

The question needs to be asked what can be learned by forcefully creating conditions that do not naturally exist anywhere in the Universe? Such a type of research is inherently a dead-end pursuit as the forcing of unnatural conditions is not designed to produce results that yield constructive benefits in the natural world. These kinds of dead-end pursuits are obviously intentional as they reflect perfectly the long-standing policy of the masters of empire for the grinding down the natural element of science, thereby hindering scientific progress. This direction is evident in the case of CERN, which pursues exotic fictional 'science' with the expenditure of tens of billions of dollars and the involvement of thousands of the world's leading-edge researchers, all channeled into a dead-end game that consumes the world's scientific talents and resources in an effort that has by its very goal no practical value. 

The CERN game is huge in every respect

The giant piece of equipment in the photograph above, dwarves a man standing beside it. The photo was taken during the construction of the CMS detector for the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.  The photo shows a super-conductor magnet that one of 15 such sections that are a part of the Compact Muon Solenoid  (CMS) experiment that will form a magnetic field, 100,000 times stronger than that of the Earth, focused on two opposing beams of protons traveling at the speed of light towards each other, that, as it is hoped, will collide. The experiment is designed to investigate a wide range of physics, including the search for the Higgs boson, extra dimensions, and particles that could make up dark matter. In every case the research is without practical value as the pursuit is for objects that do not exist in the real world, but are imagined elements that are inherent the dream of an entropic Universe. 

The CMS experiment is one of six similar experiment stations (ALICE - ATLAS - CMS - LHCb - TOTEM - LHCf ) which are all parts of the Large Hadron Collider complex.  The collider complex consists of a 27 Km long complex of two circular vacuum chambers that are surrounded by 1,600 superconductor magnets, most of them weighing 27 tons each, which are cooled with  96 tons of liquid helium to a temperature colder than outer space. The giant accelerator ring feeds the experiment stations. The entire gigantic facility is constructed more that 160 feet underground and exists for only one purpose, to accelerate two proton beams to 99.999999% of the speed of light, in opposite directions, and then collide them into each other in various different ways, at the various experiment stations located around the gigantic ring. A collision velocity of 14 trillion electron volts is expected to be achieved, in order to force protons to collide, which naturally repel each other with one of the strongest forces in the Universe, the electric force. The collision is intended to break them apart. This kind of process does not occur naturally anywhere in the Universe as far as can be determined, but is naturally guarded against by universal principles.
 (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN

Here the world of strange exotic questions begins.

One question is whether the protons can be forced to collide at all. Protons are nuclear particles that carry a positive electric change. Under the basic law of the electric force, particles of the same charge repel each other. The protons should get out of each other's way and should not collide. This is how the Universe is designed. But can this natural principle be over-powered with brute force? While protons are 100,000 times smaller than the smallest atom, it is believed that the two opposing beams of protons can be magnetically concentrated sufficiently so that some protons will indeed collide, and that the resulting collision will break the protons apart. A proton is known to be made up of three parts (called quarks) that are 'glued' together. A proton may thus be likened to a garlic bulb made up of three gloves. However, it is believed that there may exist a fourth clove, a theorized particle, a "boson." The search is for this theorized particle (theorized by a man named Higgs), which is believed to give matter its quality of mass. 

The three quarks that make up a proton are deemed to have  no 'substance,'  but exist as but fast-moving points of energy, which therefore should have no mass. Indeed, particles without mass are known to exist, such as the photon. So, where does the mass of matter come from that a proton has? It is hoped that by smashing two protons together, by which their 'cloves' (quarks) will separate, that the Higgs boson will separate with them, that it will pop out and can be detected. The problem is that the quarks are held together by the nuclear strong force, the absolute strongest force in the Universe that nobody has ever been able to break, and which is designed not to be broken. The six experiment stations, listed above have been constructed at CERN to observe in different ways what happens when the 'impossible' is forced to be happening. 

The Higgs isn't the only object for the research conducted at CERN, other objectives include the science fiction type dream of discovering "extra dimensions" and to prove the existence of "dark matter" that no instrument has ever been able to detect, but which is deemed to exist to justify the theory of an unnatural concept of Universe that is centered on the Big Bang model, an intrinsically entropic model.

Are we looking at a trap?

The effort that is expended in CERN's unnatural quest is enormous. The largest of the experiment stations ( ATLAS  ) is so enormous that it dwarves a person standing beside it into insignificance. The question that presents itself from this scale alone, is a simple one: is it all worth it? As of December 2009 more than 2900 scientists from 172 institutes in 37 countries are working on the ATLAS experiment all by itself. Are their talents wasted? Mankind doesn't have an infinite supply of leading-edge scientists. Since 'success' is by no means guaranteed, one of the scientists has joked that the entire gigantic installation may turn out to be merely the largest piece of exotic art ever created. Such is the nature of the quest of exploring the unnatural, that which should not be possible, and even then would have no purpose that applies to living in the natural world. 

We may be looking at a trap that is designed to consume a dimension of our humanity without which mankind has no future, in order to prevent a bright future from being created by mankind in which the masters of empire and their unnatural environment would have no place. Empire is after all nothing more than the chaotic outcome itself, of 'active' research - an unnatural consequence of powered interventions that create unnatural environments. Empire and its monetarism is of this type of intervention, just as the Nazi Death Camp experiments have been, and the Salem Witch Trials of the late 1600s, and so on. The coerced devolution of science by means of unnatural pursuits matches this type of profile and its consequences.

The CERN experiment may well turn out to be a giant flop, and may thereby also serve its objective 

In physical terms it may well be that the force of mass in the Universe is simply a basic quality of intention of the Intelligence that is reflected in the construction of the Universe, as are all the other forces, such as the nuclear strong force, the nuclear weak force, the electromagnetic force, and the force of gravity. The current insistence in nuclear physics is, that every physical effect must have a physical cause. But ultimately, a border is crossed where this logic no longer applies, where the underlying stratum for physics has to be some form of pure intention, which underlies the harmonized vast chain of constructs that serves the ultimate intention of the Universe, which evidently is, for it to exist. 

It cannot be said that everything that exists has no purpose and simply fell together strictly accidentally by physical reactions. The orders of complexity of everything that exits is immensely too great for one to assume that it all resulted as the construct of accidental accretion. Thus, the question of what is truth really begins at this point. 

On this issue the Large Hadron Collider effort becomes questionable. All the objects of its investigation are built around the Big Bang theory of an accidental explosion that created the Universe out of nothing in a sequence in which everything somehow fell into place in such a remarkable manner that a vast Universe resulted with a harmonizing complexity that defies the imagination. This approach to reality doesn't make sense, but this is the bases that the LHC effort is built on. It thereby has all the hallmarks of an intentional dead-end effort along the Sarpien, Fabian, Wellsian line of policy direction.

The Higgs boson, for example, is deemed to have resulted in the Big-Bang explosion out of nothing, and is deemed thave then attached itself to the quarks that became the protons, neutrons, and the electrons that formed the atoms of the Universe. The dark matter theory is likewise inherent in the Big Bang theory of the Universe. Dark matter is like the fudge factor that the ancient astronomers had required to construct in their mind a Universe without gravity, imagining epicycles and equants, and the like, in order to make the observed phenomena in the Universe match their perception of it. This is still being done. In today's world, blindfolded science imagines a Universe that exists without the electric force, that is governed by gravity alone. Dark matter thereby becomes the modern correlative to the imagined epicycles that astronomers had played with, from Ptolemy to Copernicus, to explain the orbits of the planets that had defied the basic postulate in astronomy at the time, which degreed that the orbits must be along perfect circles. It took astronomers fifteen centuries to snap out of their ignorance of the existence of universal gravity, which Johannes Kepler accomplished in the early 1600s. The Big Bang 'epicycles' (dark matter) may persist for some time yet, until the already known truth of the electric cosmology becomes accepted, which has no need to explain the observed phenomena in the Universe with the mystical concept of "dark matter" (which no person or instrument can see, such as the black holes). The LHC  research project at CERN, unfortunately, is totally committed to proving these exotic physical mythologies, the imagined 'epicycles.'

The danger is that the hoped for proof can also be imagined, by imaginary interpretations of the results. Then it will be said that the proof exists, which proves the Big Bang theory as fact, which thereby would hide the truth more intensively, rather than lay it bare so that it can be universally understood.

Black Arts Fantasies and Epicycles

The most common fantasy of the black-art 'science' is that of the existence of black holes in space.

Black holes are deemed to be the result of collapsed stars that have shed their energy when by the force of gravity its atomic structures collapsed, leaving in their wake the electrically neutral "neutrons"  that by gravity condensed into a neutron star, a star with half its original mass condensed 100,000 times. The resulting gravity is deemed to be so great that not even light can escape from it.

That's a fascination fairy tale, that only exists in the realm of fantasy, not in the real world, because neutrons do not exist in stable form outside of their function within an atomic nucleus. The neutrons that are expelled by nuclear fission reactions, in a nuclear power reactor, or elsewhere, decay within minutes into protons, unless they collide with something else by which they become absorbed and fulfill their original function. Free, stable neutrons simply don't exist. The decay of the neutrons into protons appears to be the Universe's protection against the forming of neutron stars that would eventually consume the Universe. For this reason the Universe has wisely designed for its self-protection a principle by which stable neutrons don't exist, so that neutron stars cannot happen, which are therefore sheer fantasies. Neither are proton stars possible. Protons carry an electric charge that forces them to repel each other. And this force is 39 orders of magnitude greater than gravity.

Black holes have been invented to explain an astrophysical effect that is deemed to result from gravitational lensing, without the astronomers having to bother to look for the effect in plasma physics where it is not extraordinary at all. The phenomenon of the pulsar is also placed into the court of the black hole as a super-fast rotating star, quite a miracle really, which too is not miraculous in plasma physics. Unfortunately, in spite of all the evidence plasma phenomena, which are electromagnetic in nature (since plasma - protons and electrons - is an electrically charged state of matter that comprises 99.999% of all the mass in the Universe) are deemed not to exist. Which leaves the astronomers of today free to dream of epicycles as in the days Ptolemy.

The Wellsian fantasy

A key element in the entropic world-view, that empire deploys, is the entropic Universe represented by the self-consuming Sun. A lot of what comes out of the chambers of imperial science (so-called), is promoting the notion that everything is entropic. This train of thinking that chokes science follows precisely the direction outlined by H. G. Wells who had warned the empire of his time of the danger that the advance of science poses to its existence. Thus empire champions the perversion of science, the pursuit of black-art mysteries in the name of science, such as the fusion-sun, the astrophysical black-hole (fantasy), the dark-matter (epicycles), and of course the gravity-driven and power-devoid, decaying Universe that itself has no future.  H.G. Wells would have hailed the Large Hadron Collider project, for example. With his flagship novel, The Time Machine, Wells was saying to the masters of empire of his time, you fools! Can't you see that if you don't curtail the natural advance of science, and turn it upside down, the Morlochs will eat you for breakfast? 

Wells' warning is being heeded 

If one considers the devolutionary pressure that the force of empire naturally brings to bear on science, it is not surprising that the empire's flagship of science, the Large Hadron Collider is designed to focus on dead-end issues and black-art mysteries, big-bang related stuff, including the search for "alternate realities." The LHC is 'consuming' the cream of the leading edge scientific talents by directing their focus onto dead-end pursuits, rather than developing these talents for the realization of productive pursuits. 

Not too long ago, a great problem arose for the masters of empire that nearly wrecked everything at the very core. It had greatly endangered their cherished entropic theory of the fusion powered sun . The problem was that the Sun didn't produce the huge amounts of neutrinos that a nuclear fusion engine with the power output of the Sun should be producing. Only a trickle was forthcoming. Electron neutrinos are generated whenever neutrons decay into protons, or protons are converted to neutrons - called beta decay. The neutrinos that should be detected coming from the fusion-powered Sun were glaringly missing. Neutrinos are high-energy particles that have almost no mass, which are deemed able to pass clear through a planet. An extensive network of 192 sensors had been deployed deep under water at a depth of 3,600 feet at the bottom of Lake Baikal in Russia (the Baikal Deep Underwater Neutrino Telescope facility  - NT-200), in search for the neutrinos. The sensors could be made supersensitive, being isolated into total 'silence' from all but extremely high-powered particles. But the expected neutrinos could not be detected. 

This 'dangerous' problem, which had deeply challenged the fusion-sun theory, was eventually solved with a new theory that states that the Sun is powered by an exotic type of fusion reaction that produces its power by creating free protons instead of neutrons. Protons don't decay, so that the expected flux of neutrinos was no longer required to keep the fusion-sun theory alive, thereby salvaging the theory. The salvaging of the theory was essential for empire, lest anybody would dare to think that the vast electric power flows, that power the Sun externally, might be tapped into as an inexhaustible power-resource for mankind's use. 

See: The Electric Universe - classes of perception

The myth of helium-3 being an ideal nuclear fusion fuel appears to be linked to the new fusion-theory that has for the moment salvaged the model of the fusion-powered Sun, while it has not been demonstrated than an actual power production plant, based on helium-3 fusion, is possible. Helium-3 is hailed as the "clean" fusion fuel, because it produces protons instead of neutrons, of which it is said that they can be converted directly into electricity. This conversion process, too, has not yet been demonstrated as being possible on a practical scale. The only experimental helium-3 reactor that is operating in the world requires a million times greater energy input than it gives back. 

The lack of any practically useful results throughout the entire field of fusion-power development, so far, appears to be not for the lack of imaginary approaches. Many different approaches have been tried: Tokamak, Levitated Dipole, Riggatron, Field-Reversed Configuration, Reversed Field Pinch, Magnetic Mirror Fusion Reactor, Spheromak, Laser Fusion, Z-machine, Focus Fusion, Farnsworth–Hirsch Fusor, Bussard Polywell, Muon-catalyzed Fusion, Heavy Ion Fusion, Magnetized Target Fusion, Colliding Plasma Toroid Fusion, Cold Fusion, Sonofusion, Pyroelectric Fusionand others. A rather novel approach is the proposed "crossfire fuser" that is built on getting around some of problems inherent in the above approaches. But nothing has worked so far to experimentally prove the theory of the fusion-powered Sun that the masters empire cherish in order to keep the entropic perception of Universe alive that they need to justify the entropic consequences of a world operating under empire in which all human resources are consumed and ground into dust.
 see: http://www.crossfirefusor.com/nuclear-fusion-reactor/overview.html

The obvious reason why nuclear fusion-power research fails is that the process isn't naturally happening in the Universe, where indeed principles exist that prevent it from happening. While nuclear fusion is technologically possible and has been achieved, the resulting power output from the fusion also extinguishes the 'flame.' If this principle did not exist, runaway fusion might extinguish the Universe. It may well be that nuclear-fusion-power science may be an intentionally designed trap that channels science into an unnatural pursuit of a process that doesn't happen anywhere in the Universe, which the Universe has in effect created a natural barrier against, for its self-protection. The science pursuit at CERN appears to be of this type, only much more exotically developed as a trap. The giant ITER and NIF fusion power experiments display the same type of policy underlying their inception. It is well understood in the sciences that the Universe does not operate a nuclear fusion-power process that is inherently entropic, by which the Universe becomes self-consuming in principle, and that in fact the Universe does not need to create power, but is flush with it. The Universe is power. Vast flows of electric power pervade the Universe. This fact is known, and has been known for quite a few decades already. The 'unnatural' promise for nuclear fusion power may have been a diversion on the model that CERN has expanded, which is intended to keep mankind tied into knots, looking for new power sources in all direction but the most obvious ones, like the one that powers the Universe - the electric power that powers the Sun.


Link to the exploration index

 

Go to the main page: 

 

 


 

Published by Cygni Communications Ltd. North Vancouver, BC, Canada - 2010  Rolf A. F. Witzsche

Agape Research

About Cygni

Webmaster Resources