NAWAPA XXII Ice Age Alliance (iaa) 

Escape From Fiction to Freedom


The NAWAPA 22 Science


 Rolf Witzsche
researcher, author, producer, and publisher


Two related studies, NAWAPA 22: Ice Age Alliance, and The NAWAPA 22: Government  provide an overview of the type of infrastructures that are required for the changing climate dynamics of the ongoing Ice Age transition, and the type of government that would be able to create those structures for the continued existence of civilization and humanity with it in the coming ice age environment, for which the transition has already begun. But has the transition really begun? The study on this page focuses on the science that enables an understanding of the urgent need for building an N22-based civilization. Has the long-expected Ice Age transition really begun? (See my overview video:
The New Ice Age)

The key to answering this question was first presented by the astronomer Johannes Kepler in the early 1600s. Kepler discovered the physical principles inherent in the observed planetary motions. He discovered three fundamental laws, of which the Third Law applies to the subject at hand. He discovered that a lawful relationship exists between the orbital speed of a planet and its distance from the Sun. With the force of gravity diminishing with the square of the distance, a planet's orbital speed must be slower for a more distant planet so that its centrifugal force matches the weaker gravitational pull on it. Kepler discovered that this law applies to all planets in the solar system. Accordingly there exists a close to 10-fold differential in orbital speed between the innermost planet of the solar system and the outermost planet. This slowing-down relationship for the outer planets creates an exponential reduction of the orbital speed.  What makes Kepler's discovery of this relationship critical for the subject on hand is the later discovered fact that movements of stars in our galaxy do not follow the gravitational orbital laws, but do the opposite instead. The stars closer to the center of the galaxy move slower instead of faster, and those more distant move faster instead of slower. The only logical explanation for this paradox is that the motion of the stars is motivated by a different force than the force of gravitational attraction, with different principles being expressed.

Indeed, two different types of forces with a long reach across space do exist in the universe. One is the force of gravity by which an apple falls to the ground, and the other is the electromagnetic force, such as expressed in lightning that can demolish the apple tree when it 'falls' on it. The electromagnetic force operates on different principles than the force of gravity, and is 36 orders of magnitude stronger and does not diminish with the square of the distance. It is the operating force expressed in the galaxy by the movements of vast electric power streams. This quality makes the electromagnetic force important for the subject on hand, the subject of the Ice Age dynamics. (See my Kepler video series: Science Revolution - part 1)

The point is, that if the galaxy is organized by the power of the electric force it stands to reason that this all-pervading electric force is also expressed in the solar system, which is a part of the galaxy. Strong evidence exists that this is indeed the case, and that it is this power that powers the Sun.

Two theories exist about the nature of the Sun.

One theory has it that the Sun exists isolated in space powered by its own fuel that 'burns' in a hydrogen fusion process. This theory presents the Sun as an invariable factor in the climate equation. The large climate changes that cause the ice ages are theorized to be the result of long-term cyclical variations of the orbit of the earth around the Sun, called the Milankovitch cycles. These cycles are causing seasonal and hemispheric variations of the exposure of the earth to the Sun, but do not vary the total exposure. According to this theory the Ice Age cycles are precisely mathematically predictable. The problem is that the historic data in ice core samples doesn't match the predictions. Also, the computed exposure variations are too weak to have caused the momentous glaciation that has occurred during the last Ice Age. It is a simple fact that no matter how extensive the tilt of the spin-axis of the Earth varies, and its orbit around the Sun becomes eccentric, the total exposure of the Earth to the Sun remains the same for all cases. It all means that a mathematical prediction of the Ice Age dynamics is not possible.

The second theory about our Sun has it that the Sun is an integrated element of the galactic power dynamics. As such it is powered by the galactic electric power streams, which are streams of plasma in motion. In this context the Sun is not its own master, but serves the function of en electric energy converter. This renders the Sun an inherently variable star that reflects variances in input power density. Some of the cyclical variances of this type are well known. One is the 11-year solar cycle. The Sun's energy output in the extreme UV band varies by a factor of 20 over the course of the solar cycle. The 11-year solar cycle is an energy-fluctuation cycle of the type that one would expect from an electric resonance. In this case the electric resonance would be a resonance inherent in the heliosphere, which is of a size appropriate for an 11-year cycle time. A number of longer repetitive cycles, superimposed on each other, have also been observed. However, here again a precise mathematical prediction of the Ice Age dynamics is not possible, because electric phenomena are affected by too many factors of distant origin beyond our range of detection. However we do have sufficient historic data accumulated in the ice core samples of Greenland and Antarctica to study the general dynamics and to draw conclusions.

From a statistical standpoint the current interglacial period has come to an end. Observation from space by the NASA Ulysses satellite, has shown that a large reduction of 30% in the solar wind pressure, and an equal reduction of the underlying solar magnetic field has occurred from 1998 on till the satellite was turned off in 2008. It is anybody's guess if the observed phenomenon is an anomaly that has occurred before, or is the start of the expected trend and a part of the transition process. However, and this get interesting, coincident with it the observed solar strength, a sharp increase in earthquakes around the world has been recorded, beginning at the same time at which the reduction in solar strength has been observed. And the increase in earthquakes is huge. It is 15-fold for North America, over the historic average, ranging to over 70-fold for Indonesia.  This type of sharp increase has not been seen in all recorded history. This means that a significant change has occurred in the solar power environment.  A major reduction of the plasma density around the Sun would cause increased solar proton mass ejections that also affect the Earth, accumulate in the ground, and eventually result in electric stress explosions, causing earthquakes, triggering even big faults that had remained dormant for centuries.

The coincidence of the increased earthquakes with the observed reduced solar strength doesn't proof in itself that the long expected Ice Age transition has begun, but it does suggest that this may be the case.

If one looks at the ice core records with this in mind, corroborating evidence suggests that we may indeed be sitting at the beginning of a major new trend. The ice core records show the existence of 200-year cycles, starting with a downturn that became the Little Ice Age, followed by a 200-year upturn that gave us the warm interlude that the global warming doctrine cried about, and which now begins its next downturn. The ice core records show that the big changes happen early in the cycle. The overall trend seems to suggest that the current down cycle will be stronger than the last one. We may be looking at a new Little Ice Age that exceeds the previous one five-fold in its cooling.

Corroborating evidence that a major reduction of electric power density in the solar system has occurred can also be found in the magnetic measurements that are published as the planetary-A index which shows such a dramatic drop that some people fear that a reversal of the magnetic field of the earth may be immanent. It should be noted that any magnetic field occurring anywhere in the universe is exclusively the result of electricity in motion. This applies to the Earth's magnetic field, as well as to that of the Sun. When the strength of these fields change, something big is in progress.

Indeed, if one looks at the Greenland ice core data, covering a more-extended period it becomes apparent that a major transition towards lower global temperatures had begun already as far back as 2,000 years ago after the Roman warming, which was followed by a second down step roughly 1,500 years ago, followed by another recovery and more down-steps. In this context it may be said that the Ice Age transition to the next glaciation cycle began already 2,000 years ago and is gradually speeding up with some big moves happening in the present. While we are far from hitting the bottom with temperatures 30 to 50 times colder than the Little Ice Age, it doesn't really matter when a 5-times colder environment is enough to shut down agriculture across much of the northern hemisphere. If one looks at the present trend, and sees them in terms of electrodynamics by which the Sun is not a constant factor, it is reasonable to assume that a major disabling cooling will likely occur within the coming 50-year timeframe.

While nothing is certain on the Ice Age transition front where dramatic unexpected changes in the electric density, which powers the entire system, can occur at almost any time, enough is known to warrant the economic preparations to be made as fast as possible that the expected resulting climate changes will require. Enough is known about this highly volatile front to assert with near certainty that if the climate changes occur as fast and as extensive as they have the potential to occur, much of humanity may become extinct by starvation when the food production infrastructures become thereby enabled in a short period of time. In this context NAWAPA 22 comes to light as a critical strategic platform for the defense of humanity, so that society pursuing anything less can be seen as paramount to committing suicide.

The potential for devastating consequences in an Ice Age transition is so great that any form of gambling on this front may make the imperial depopulation plans appear benign in comparison. In this context the Ice Age transition has the potential to be as dangerous as a nuclear war, with the difference that nuclear war can be easily avoided, while the Ice Age transition cannot be avoided by any means presently known. The nuclear-war danger can be eliminated in a day by disabling all the nukes. It is known where each one is located, and disabling them all for the strategic defense of humanity isn't a huge technical task. The Ice Age transition, however, cannot be bypassed. Nothing will stop it. Only its consequences can be avoided. NAWAPA 22 comes to light as a proposal to accomplish that and to create a richer world for all humanity by the same process. The purpose of N22 is to create a renaissance on the entire human front with such a power that even a full-blown Ice Age cannot touch it. But do we really need an Ice Age challenge for that? What would hinder us to start with it today? 
(See my big Ice Age videos:
Ice Age Now)

 

Rolf Witzsche
researcher, author, producer, and publisher

My published books, research, novels, science, free online,

Please invest into the future - Thank You

Published by Cygni Communications Ltd. North Vancouver, BC, Canada - (C) in public domain - producer Rolf A. F. Witzsche

Agape Research

About Cygni

Webmaster Resources